SPAM NOTES:
a law blog covering electronic communications,
email, social networks, privacy, and more
Electronic Communications, Privacy, Data Protection, and More: Category Archive for Investigation and Enforcement

CAN-SPAM Plaintiff Taxed With $30K in Costs

Virginia Seeks US Supreme Court Review of Jaynes

Judge Lasnik Denies Impulse Media's Request for Fees Under EAJA

Are Courts Getting Tired of Spam Plaintiffs?

The Long Road to a 236MM Spam Judgment

Do Text Messages Fall Within the TCPA? [Timberland Settles SMS Class Action for $7 Million]

Trouble Stomaching the Virginia Supreme Court's Spam Decision

Frontier Justice on the Internet

Stay Granted Against Asis

Va. Supreme Ct.: Spam Law Violates First Amendment

Can MySpace Suits Can the Spam

Federal Trial Court Shoots Down Another CAN-SPAM Lawsuit

Federal Judge Rejects Strict CAN-SPAM Causation

Project Honey Pot Lawsuit Faces 20 Day Deadline

VA S.Ct. Rejects First Amendment Challenge to Spam Statute (on Standing Grounds)

Anti-Spam Community Up in Arms: North Dakota Judge Slams David Ritz

VA High Court Hears Free Speech Challenge to Spam Law

Herbal Supplement Class Action Wraps Up

Defendants Convicted in 1st Criminal CAN-SPAM Trial

Spamhaus Rebuffed by Seventh Circuit

Seventh Circuit Affirms Rejection of Data Breach Claims

MySpace Follow Up (Are "In-Network" Messages Subject to CAN-SPAM)?

Court Issues MySpace Injunction Against Wallace

Court Tags CAN-SPAM Plaintiff With $111,000 Fee Award

Court to Lawyer: Whitelist the Court Domain Name!

Anti-Spammers Trucking Along

6th Cir. Stored Communication Decision

CAN-SPAM: Another FTC Enforcement Action Encounters Obstacles

Zango Update: No TRO Against Kaspersky

Court Denies Request for TRO Against PC Tools

Zango Update

Spam wars: MySpace v The Globe.com

The Strange Saga of James Gordon

Spamhaus: Chasing the White Whale?

A CAN-SPAM Case Actually Goes to Trial?

Mumma Takes a Fall

Unspam's At it Again - the Spam Harvester Lawsuit

Spamhaus and 230 Immunity

The Spamhaus Amicus Brief

Federal Court Finds no Strict Liability Under CAN-SPAM

MySpace v. Richter [yawn]

Learn to Live With Spam

Spamhaus Update - Judge Denies e360 Order

ICANN SAYS NO ES POSIBLE

SPAMHAUS ON THE ROCKS?

TRACKING THE SPAMMERS

Media Mentions and Articles

Media Mentions:

The twisted world of online copyright
(Econsultancy; Nov. 11, 2010)

Rise and Fall of a Spam Crusader
(North Coast Journal; Sept. 30, 2010)

Appeals court absolves firm that exposed man's SSN
(The Register; June 4, 2010)

Spam--a Lot
(ABA Journal/Wendy Davis; March 1, 2010)

Texas county to name drunk drivers on Twitter
(SF Gate/IDG News; Dec. 24, 2009)

Starbucks sued after laptop data breach (NetworkWorld.com; Feb. 23, 2009)

Spam pins 'Strong Arm' Missed court date earns Frank Azar judge's reprimand
(Rocky Mountain News)

Microsoft Sues More Hotmail Spammers
(PC World)

Zango Sues Antispyware Vendor PC Tools (InfoWorld)

Software Notebook: Two major spam cases end up in Seattle
(Seattle PI)

Venkat on Copyright and More 1/2
(Rasmus Rasmussen Dot Com; May 22, 2009)

Court Limits Third-Party Text Message Ads
(Inside Counsel; September 1, 2009)

Articles:

CAN-SPAM Put to the Test (cNet; May 22, 2007)

Spyware Skirmishes: Spy Versus Antispy (cNet; June 5, 2007)

Recent Posts

  1. The Marble and the Sculptor
    Tuesday, December 31, 2013
  2. The Problem With the Sharknado Reference
    Friday, July 19, 2013
  3. Just Who Are the Change Agents in Law?
    Saturday, January 19, 2013
  4. Disconnection and Organization
    Sunday, December 23, 2012
  5. Blogger Motivation
    Tuesday, November 20, 2012
  6. Twitter
    Saturday, July 07, 2012
  7. Leaving Facebook
    Sunday, June 10, 2012
  8. Seattle Blawger Meetup
    Sunday, April 15, 2012
  9. A Reading List for the Novice Social Networking Lawyer
    Thursday, April 05, 2012
  10. Randazza
    Saturday, March 24, 2012

Recent Comments

Subscribe


DISCLAIMER:

None of the information on this blog is legal advice, and you as the reader should not rely on it. The blog is intended to discuss legal issues and cases at a general level, without reference to your particular facts and circumstances. You should consult a qualified professional if you have questions about anything you read on the blog.