SPAM NOTES:
a law blog covering electronic communications,
email, social networks, privacy, and more
Electronic Communications, Privacy, Data Protection, and More: Category Archive for Threshold Defenses and Motions

Federal Court (N.D. Cal.) Bucks Trend, Limits CAN-SPAM Preemption

CAN-SPAM Preempts Ohio Email Statute

Are Courts Too Easy on Spam Plaintiffs?

CAN-SPAM Preemption - Altria Group Inc. v. Good

Gordon Soldiers On, This Time Against Subscriberbase

Asis Files Amicus Brief in Gordon v. Virtumundo

CAN-SPAM: Peacefire Wins on Standing in the Western District of Washington

Perez Not Subject to Jurisdiction in OH for Posting Email

Court Grants CAN-SPAM Defendant's Request for Bond

MySpace Text Class Action (in Illinois)

Comcast Serves up Some Tasty Section 230 Morsels

Dismissal on Personal Jurisdictional Grounds Affirmed against Spam Plaintiff

Washington AG: Virtumundo Should be Limited so as to Not Cause Blanket Preemption

Anti-Spammers Trucking Along

Zango Update: No TRO Against Kaspersky

Court Denies Request for TRO Against PC Tools

Zango Update

Pleading Matters

The Tide Continues: Court Shoots Down Spam Class Action

The Strange Saga of James Gordon

Utah Child Protection Registry Upheld Against CAN-SPAM Preemption, Commerce Clause, and First Amendment Challenges

Federal Court Rejects Vagueness Challenge to CAN-SPAM

Federal Court Rejects Particularity Challenge to Spam Claims

About That Bond Requirement

BEATING THE DEAD FIRST AMENDMENT HORSE? NOT QUITE

PREEMPTION ISSUES

ARE YOU A PROVIDER OF AN INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE?

LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION?

Media Mentions and Articles

Media Mentions:

The twisted world of online copyright
(Econsultancy; Nov. 11, 2010)

Rise and Fall of a Spam Crusader
(North Coast Journal; Sept. 30, 2010)

Appeals court absolves firm that exposed man's SSN
(The Register; June 4, 2010)

Spam--a Lot
(ABA Journal/Wendy Davis; March 1, 2010)

Texas county to name drunk drivers on Twitter
(SF Gate/IDG News; Dec. 24, 2009)

Starbucks sued after laptop data breach (NetworkWorld.com; Feb. 23, 2009)

Spam pins 'Strong Arm' Missed court date earns Frank Azar judge's reprimand
(Rocky Mountain News)

Microsoft Sues More Hotmail Spammers
(PC World)

Zango Sues Antispyware Vendor PC Tools (InfoWorld)

Software Notebook: Two major spam cases end up in Seattle
(Seattle PI)

Venkat on Copyright and More 1/2
(Rasmus Rasmussen Dot Com; May 22, 2009)

Court Limits Third-Party Text Message Ads
(Inside Counsel; September 1, 2009)

Articles:

CAN-SPAM Put to the Test (cNet; May 22, 2007)

Spyware Skirmishes: Spy Versus Antispy (cNet; June 5, 2007)

Recent Posts

  1. Athletes and Singers Have Coaches. Should Lawyers?
    Thursday, October 06, 2011
  2. Lawyers and Klout
    Thursday, August 25, 2011
  3. Koncision's NDA Builder
    Thursday, June 16, 2011
  4. Are Social Media Legal Issues Overhyped?
    Saturday, June 04, 2011
  5. Beware of the Online "Filter Bubble"
    Tuesday, May 17, 2011
  6. Seeking: a Seth Godin Decoder Ring
    Wednesday, May 04, 2011
  7. What Lawyers Can Learn From Journalists
    Tuesday, April 26, 2011
  8. The Vandals Blast Variety Magazine and its Lawyers
    Monday, April 18, 2011
  9. What is the "iPad for Lawyers" Crowd Smoking?
    Sunday, April 10, 2011
  10. Flourishes in Judicial Opinions
    Saturday, April 09, 2011

Recent Comments

  1. shg on Lawyers and Klout
    8/26/2011
  2. Bruce Carton on Lawyers and Klout
    8/25/2011
  3. William Carleton on Lawyers and Klout
    8/25/2011
  4. Troy Blackford on Seeking: a Seth Godin Decoder Ring
    8/17/2011
  5. Max Kennerly on Seeking: a Seth Godin Decoder Ring
    7/26/2011
  6. Ken Adams on Koncision's NDA Builder
    6/16/2011
  7. Brian Flock on Are Social Media Legal Issues Overhyped?
    6/6/2011
  8. Shawn E. Tuma on Are Social Media Legal Issues Overhyped?
    6/6/2011
  9. David canton on Are Social Media Legal Issues Overhyped?
    6/5/2011
  10. Venkat on Beware of the Online "Filter Bubble"
    5/18/2011

Subscribe


DISCLAIMER:

None of the information on this blog is legal advice, and you as the reader should not rely on it. The blog is intended to discuss legal issues and cases at a general level, without reference to your particular facts and circumstances. You should consult a qualified professional if you have questions about anything you read on the blog.