The Rise and Fall of a Spam Plaintiff

I've blogged a bunch about cases brought by Asis Internet:
  1. CAN-SPAM Plaintiff Taxed With $30K in Costs;
  2. Asis Files Amicus Brief in Gordon v. Virtumundo;
  3. Court Grants CAN-SPAM Defendant's Request for Bond;
  4. Asis Internet Soldiers On;
  5. Asis Internet's Lead Lawsuit Rejected on Summary Judgment;
  6. Federal Court Rejects Particularity Challenge to Spam Claims;
  7. About That Bond Requirement;
  8. Ninth Circuit Rebuffs Another CAN-SPAM Plaintiff.
I'd go so far as to say that they were a driving force for this blog through the years.  Asis brought a slew of lawsuits (20 by one judge's count), and in the process, was partially responsible for rulings that touched on many different aspects of CAN-SPAM, and California's spam statute (much of it not favorable to plaintiffs).

Recently, Asis won a big judgment, but in a separate case was hit with a big ruling for fees:  "CAN-SPAM Plaintiff Slammed With $800K Attorney Fee Award." Ultimately, this resulted in Asis abandoning its spam litigation efforts: "Veteran Spam Plaintiff Abandons Spam Lawsuit."

Ryan Burns of the North Coast Journal takes a look at the rise and fall of Asis: "Rise and Fall of a Spam Crusader."  The article profiles the owner of Asis, as well as her lawyer, both of whom have apparently decided that they're done with spam litigation:
it’s past the time for arguments. White [the owner of Asis] left town this week to continue her studies of Vedanta and Sanskrit, but she’ll come back to her home in Garberville. Singleton’s law practice continues, though he says his days of prosecuting CAN-SPAM cases are over.
Ryan's article is worth checking out.

Laura Atkins offers her thoughts here:  "Suing spammers."
 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.