Parties are not shy about splattering their spleens through cyberspace.

An awesome line from a frustrated judge dealing with a contentious divorce case (footnote 23 in Bruni v. Bruni, 2010 ONSC 6568 (Nov. 29, 2010)) [pdf]. 

The rest of the footnote rings true as well:
In recent years, the evidence in family trials typically includes reams of text messages between the parties, helpfully laying bare their true characters. Asserting credibility is not nearly as difficult as it was before the use of e-mails and text messages became prolific. Parties are not shy about splattering their spleens through cyberspace.
(via Lowering the Bar) (Eric Goldman)

Loosely related:  "Ex-BigLaw Partner Disbarred for Bogus Time Entries, Expensed Meals for Internet Dates":
Denti and the divorce client had both denied a sexual relationship, but flirtatious e-mails told a different story, according to the opinion. The document goes through a series of questions presented to Denti during the ethics hearing and his denials, including this question: “Let's talk about your e-mail. What are you talking about with a whole case of raincoats and using them all in one night?”

“I think I’m joking,” he replies, and then says it probably refers to the client's husband.
The emails and the explanation are a painful read - even funnier than the language quoted in the ABA Journal story is the fact that when asked about emails discussing soreness and fatigue from the evening before, Denti said it was because he or she had been using a new trampoline.  "Three times," the questioner asked .. you used the trampoline "three times?"  Oy.

[pdf]
.
 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.