SPAM NOTES:
a law blog covering electronic communications,
email, social networks, privacy, and more
Electronic Communications, Privacy, Data Protection, and More: Monthly Archives for March 2010

Media Mentions and Articles

Media Mentions:

The twisted world of online copyright
(Econsultancy; Nov. 11, 2010)

Rise and Fall of a Spam Crusader
(North Coast Journal; Sept. 30, 2010)

Appeals court absolves firm that exposed man's SSN
(The Register; June 4, 2010)

Spam--a Lot
(ABA Journal/Wendy Davis; March 1, 2010)

Texas county to name drunk drivers on Twitter
(SF Gate/IDG News; Dec. 24, 2009)

Starbucks sued after laptop data breach (NetworkWorld.com; Feb. 23, 2009)

Spam pins 'Strong Arm' Missed court date earns Frank Azar judge's reprimand
(Rocky Mountain News)

Microsoft Sues More Hotmail Spammers
(PC World)

Zango Sues Antispyware Vendor PC Tools (InfoWorld)

Software Notebook: Two major spam cases end up in Seattle
(Seattle PI)

Venkat on Copyright and More 1/2
(Rasmus Rasmussen Dot Com; May 22, 2009)

Court Limits Third-Party Text Message Ads
(Inside Counsel; September 1, 2009)

Articles:

CAN-SPAM Put to the Test (cNet; May 22, 2007)

Spyware Skirmishes: Spy Versus Antispy (cNet; June 5, 2007)

Recent Posts

  1. Seattle Blawger Meetup
    Sunday, April 15, 2012
  2. A Reading List for the Novice Social Networking Lawyer
    Thursday, April 05, 2012
  3. Randazza
    Saturday, March 24, 2012
  4. Walmart Viewers
    Friday, February 10, 2012
  5. Please be Honest and Tell me This Post Sucks
    Wednesday, February 08, 2012
  6. Twitter's Decision to Censor
    Saturday, January 28, 2012
  7. Happy National Compliment Day
    Tuesday, January 24, 2012
  8. Why Lawyers Should Use Pinterest
    Friday, January 20, 2012
  9. Podcast: Honk if You Love Free Speech
    Friday, November 25, 2011
  10. Ceglia's New Lawyer Derides Facebook's iPad-Less Legal Team
    Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Recent Comments

Subscribe


DISCLAIMER:

None of the information on this blog is legal advice, and you as the reader should not rely on it. The blog is intended to discuss legal issues and cases at a general level, without reference to your particular facts and circumstances. You should consult a qualified professional if you have questions about anything you read on the blog.